![]() I inquired about future steps and additional costs for developing my idea. I was given links to a handful of videos and presented an “act now and save 10%” program. The overall feeling of the process is having a car salesman push you to spend money on research. Davison requests $795 dollars to provide copyright research, quote to build a prototype and potential companies for marketing the idea. I gave lots of details for the good idea and little effort explaining the bad concept yet both moved to an investment request. ![]() The interview for both ideas were similar. Users Must Agree Before Submitting Ideas (click to enlarge) My gut tells me this protects Davison from future lawsuits. As you can see, they are open about how unlikely they can bring your idea to market. One interesting part of the process is Davison requires users to accept that they have reviewed Davison’s success rate. I filled out an online form for both ideas and eventually spoke with a sales rep. The first idea is something I believe is great while the other is ridiculous and should be discarded. I submitted two ideas under different aliases to put Davison to the test. I question Davison about the negative feedback and was provided rebuttal videos targeting the Better Business Bureau as a means to defuse the bad press (see HERE ). If you search Google for Davison customer feedback, you will find endless complaints and lawsuits. Their website has customer quotes, products they brought to market (see HERE) and videos from popular TV shows like Lifetime’s The Balancing Act (see HERE). Davison presents itself as a successful invention firm.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |